Handling an Angry Customer

The hard part of a complaint is writing back while you are still feeling it. This drafts first so you have something to read over instead of firing off a reply. The results accept what should be accepted, offer a clear way forward, and stop short of conceding things that would leave the shop exposed.

What you provide: text · What you get back: text

What you get back

Built for both cases — when the shop was genuinely at fault, and when the customer has misunderstood.

  • Three replies, from most conciliatory to a polite restatement of policy
  • What to verify before replying: delivery records, order times, what was promised
  • What not to commit to in a first message, since retracting it later escalates things
  • Signals to stop handling it yourself and escalate — legal threats or safety issues

Why the verification list matters

Most damage comes not from replying slowly but from replying quickly without the facts and then having to reverse it in the next message. Checking two or three things first is usually what lets one reply end the matter.

The line it will not cross

It will not promise a refund, grant a discount, or admit fault on the shop's behalf — those are binding business decisions. It leaves a gap and tells you what to fill in, and you always press send.

What it costs

Billed by actual use — Points first, then Credits, with an estimate shown before you run it.

Frequently asked questions

The customer is being abusive.
The draft does not respond in kind, and marks the point at which ending the conversation is reasonable.
It is a public review, not a chat.
Say so, and it is written with the knowledge that others are reading.
What if we really were at fault?
Say so plainly and offer a fix you can deliver. It helps you write that without conceding more than happened.
AI Assistant
Please Sign In

Sign in to chat with our smart AI assistant in real-time.

Sign In